What did the ITF Amendment Act 2011 actually change?

Industrial Training Fund (Amendment) Act 2011 cut the staff threshold, raised fines and lowered the training reimbursement cap. Here is what changed, with sources.

2 min readBy the Docufy editorial team

Quick answer

Industrial Training Fund (Amendment) Act 2011 rewrote several figures in the original 1971 Act. It cut the staff threshold, raised the fines on conviction, and lowered the maximum training reimbursement. PwC's professional summary is the main source for the figures, since the dates and amounts are not all laid out on a single ITF page.

Amending law
Industrial Training Fund (Amendment) Act 2011
Current staff threshold
5 or more employees
Fine for a body corporate (as reported)
₦500,000 for a first breach and ₦1,000,000 for each later breach
Current reimbursement cap
up to 50% of the training contribution paid
On this page

Most of the ITF figures employers work with today, including one many assume has always applied, trace back to a single amendment.

Why the original Act needed updating

The Industrial Training Fund itself dates to a 1971 decree. Industrial Training Fund (Amendment) Act 2011 updated several of its numbers decades later, rather than replacing the Fund's purpose.

PwC's professional summary of the amendment is the main source most later commentary, including ITF-adjacent guides, still draws from for these specific figures.

The staff threshold got smaller

Before the amendment, PwC's summary reports a considerably higher headcount threshold for compulsory contribution. The amendment cut that down to 5 or more employees, which is the figure in force now.

That single change pulled many more small and mid-sized employers into the Act. A business that was comfortably outside the old threshold may sit well inside the current one.

The fines went up

The same summary describes much smaller fines applying before 2011. Afterwards, a body corporate convicted of a breach faces ₦500,000 for a first breach and ₦1,000,000 for each later breach, a sharp increase on the earlier figures.

See ITF fines for a company for how this fine differs from the separate, more commonly encountered late-payment penalty.

The training reimbursement cap came down

Employers who train their staff and claim money back under ITF's scheme saw a change too. PwC's summary describes a higher maximum award before the amendment, reduced afterwards to up to 50% of the training contribution paid.

The window and deadline for that claim are covered in the ITF training plan window and reimbursement claim.

Why the exact date is worth double-checking

Sources describing this amendment do not always agree on every date attached to it. Where a specific commencement date matters to you, for instance in a legal dispute, verify it against the gazetted text rather than relying on a summary alone.

For day-to-day compliance, the figures in force today, not the history behind them, are what matter most.

What this history means for you now

  1. Use today's threshold, 5 or more employees, not an older figure you may have seen quoted.
  2. Budget contributions and any potential fine exposure against current amounts, not pre-2011 ones.
  3. If training and claiming reimbursement, plan around today's cap, up to 50% of the training contribution paid, rather than a higher figure some older articles still repeat.

Common mistakes

  • Quoting a staff threshold or fine amount from an article written before the figures were checked against the current Act.
  • Assuming the training reimbursement cap is still at its pre-2011 level, when current guidance says otherwise.
  • Treating the 2011 amendment as ancient history that no longer affects today's compliance.

For where these figures sit today, see who must pay the ITF levy and the ITF compliance certificate guide.

Questions people ask

What was the staff threshold before 2011?

PwC's summary of Industrial Training Fund (Amendment) Act 2011 reports a considerably higher headcount threshold before the amendment, cut to 5 or more employees afterwards.

Were the fines always this size?

No. PwC's summary reports much smaller fines before 2011, replaced by ₦500,000 for a first breach and ₦1,000,000 for each later breach for a body corporate on conviction.

Did the training reimbursement scheme change too?

Yes. The same summary says the maximum award fell to up to 50% of the training contribution paid, down from a higher cap before the amendment.

Is the exact commencement date of the amendment settled?

Not entirely. PwC's summary is the source used here; treat any specific date you see quoted elsewhere as coming from the same kind of professional summary, not a single, definitive ITF statement.

Sources

Last checked 27 Sep 2026. Fees and rules change; the agency that issues the document has the final word. See our editorial policy.

Keep reading

ITF compliance certificate guide (2026)

All articles on tenders and compliance